It's on us. Share your news here.

Poor Interim Results of Peers Point to Maersk Line 2Q Loss

Posted on August 15, 2016

By Greg Knowler, JOC.com

In an industry always searching for bellwethers, the first half financials of Hong Kong’s OOCL offer an indication of what to expect from Maersk Line when the Danish carrier delivers its second quarter results on Friday.

Like Maersk Line, OOCL is a member of the exclusive club of container shipping companies that generally make a profit, but the weak market conditions saw the carrier slumping to its first interim loss in seven years.

But no matter how well managed a carrier is, there is no escape from the weak demand and excess vessel supply that has been dragging down freight rates and deeply eroding shipping’s revenue earned per teu. It led to Maersk Line’s first quarter break-even result and is expected to be reflected in its second quarter financials.

“It is going to be ugly,” was the short and sharp assessment of Alphaliner’s Tan Hua Joo.

Fellow maritime analysts Drewry laid out just how ugly the results will be, expecting the average revenue per feu container to have fallen 17% in the second quarter to USD1,869. This is almost USD400 less than the revenue per feu earned in the same period of last year and the analysts are expecting Maersk Line to fall into the red in the second quarter with a USD57 million net loss.

The container shipping industry is probably better judged on earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) but according to Drewry’s forecast this figure will reflect a loss of USD63 million in the second quarter. A poll of Reuter’s analysts predicted Maersk Line would deliver a net loss of USD47 million.

Drewry gave reasons for its negative second half outlook for the Danish carrier. “Development of freight rates is significantly weaker than expected, recovery at the beginning of July doesn’t seem sufficient and sustainable – effectively a washout peak season is in the offing, in our view – and bunker prices have increased throughout the second quarter rendering a cost disadvantage,” the analyst noted in a report.

Another top 10 carrier, Hapag-Lloyd, also announced its interim results this week and provided another example of how destructive low freight rates are to a container line’s balance sheet. The German line, that is busy digesting CSAV that it acquired recently, reported a USD110 million second quarter loss and a USD159 million first half loss.

Average revenue per teu fell almost 20% in the second half compared to the same period in 2015.

None of this is good news for Maersk Line. Apart from a dismal operating environment, the world’s largest shipping group is in the early stages of regime change with the former liner division chief executive officer Soren Skou recently elevated to group CEO at the expense of former boss Nils Andersen. Skou will retain the Maersk Line CEO portfolio, emphasising the importance of the group’s largest division.

The second quarter financials will be the first set of group-wide results that he will be delivering and they come at a time of restructuring at the carrier. Maersk Group is in the middle of a strategic and structural review of its businesses that is being led by Skou, and this has seen ratings agency Standard & Poor’s place the company on a negative credit watch.

“We understand that the disposal of one or several of Maersk’s main business units could form part of the review’s outcome, and we think that such a split would hurt the group’s business diversification,” S&P noted.

Immediately after it was announced that Andersen had been replaced, reports emerged that the company was considering splitting up its five core business areas that in addition to container transport include oil tankers, drilling, terminals, and logistics and marine services.

Maersk Group Chairman Michael Pram Rasmussen told Danish media that the board was considering whether it made sense to break apart the five businesses.

S&P said Maersk Line’s operating performance may falter as its container shipping business faced freight rate volatility and downward pressure on both primary and secondary routes.

Source: Fairplay

It's on us. Share your news here.
Submit Your News Today

Join Our
Newsletter
Click to Subscribe