Posted on March 9, 2017
2016 Highlights
- Significant structural changes throughout the Company to provide a solid platform for future success
- 68% year over year increase in gross profit
- 86% year over year increase in EBITDA
- Bid on record-high
$2.8 billion of projects during 2016, with a win rate of 24% - Completed the integration of our
Commercial Concrete Construction segment - 58% year over year increase in
Dallas market commercial concrete revenues - Prepared to further develop our targeted infrastructure, industrial and building sectors
“During 2016, we made significant, long-term improvements in our operations, and saw continued strong demand for our services,” said
Mr. Stauffer continued, “Our fourth quarter reported results were impacted by one-time charges related to the accounting treatment of a contract issue involving significant, highly unusual differing site conditions on a large, multi-year dredging service project. Our ability to execute the project as originally planned was hampered when we encountered a significantly greater quantity of trash, debris, and ship traffic delays, than were anticipated by the project owner, or Orion, when the contract was signed. We have developed and are pursuing a large equitable contract adjustment, which we believe is fully supported by the contract and actual work performed, as well as the detailed facts and evidence that support our position. As a diligent contractor, we completed the project to the customer’s specifications and we are vigorously pursuing the proper compensation for our efforts and the project’s success. While we believe we are entitled to our full earned compensation, accounting practices limit the amount of contract revenue we can recognize at this time. Therefore, during the fourth quarter we incurred significant unforeseen expenses without the ability to recognize the related revenues for the work performed to complete this project. While we are disappointed with the accounting treatment and the associated impacts to our fourth quarter results, we ultimately expect to bring this matter to satisfactory conclusion. A successful outcome would reflect positively in our future results and be a benefit to our shareholders.”
Consolidated Results for Fourth Quarter 2016 Compared to Fourth Quarter 2015
- Contract revenues were
$144.3 million , a decrease of 10.9%, as compared to$161.9 million in the prior year period. The decrease is primarily attributable to one-time charges related to the accounting treatment of a specific contract with significant differing site conditions, as well as the timing and mix of projects. - Gross profit was
$11.7 million , as compared to$17.4 million in the prior year period. Gross profit margin for fourth quarter 2016 was 8.1%, as compared to 10.8% in the prior year period. The decrease is primarily attributable to one-time charges related to the accounting treatment of a specific contract with significant differing site conditions, as well as the timing and mix of projects. - Selling, General, and Administrative expenses were
$17.3 million , as compared to$15.7 million in the prior year period. The increase is attributable to increased accounting and consulting fees, as well as higher group health expenses. - EBITDA was
$3.1 million , representing a 2.2% EBITDA margin, as compared to fourth quarter 2015 EBITDA of$12.8 million , or 8.0% EBITDA margin.
Consolidated Results for Full Year 2016 Compared to Full Year 2015
- Contract revenues were
$578.2 million , an increase of 24.0%, as compared to$466.5 million . The increase is primarily attributable to the acquisition of TAS concrete, offset by the retrenchment ofTampa operations and to one-time charges related to the accounting treatment of a specific contract with significant differing site conditions. - Gross profit was
$67.5 million , an increase of 67.9%, as compared to$40.2 million . Gross profit margin was 11.7% for full year 2016, as compared to 8.6% in the prior year. The increase is primarily attributable to the acquisition of TAS concrete, offset by the retrenchment ofTampa operations and to one-time charges related to the accounting treatment of a specific contract with significant differing site conditions. - Selling, General, and Administrative expense was
$65.0 million , as compared with$47.7 million . The increase is primarily attributable to the acquisition of TAS concrete. - EBITDA was
$38.3 million , representing a 6.6% EBITDA margin, which compares to EBITDA of$20.6 million , or a 4.4% EBITDA margin.
Segment Results for Fourth Quarter 2016 Compared to Fourth Quarter 2015
- Contract revenues were
$60.1 million , a decrease of 32.9%, as compared to$89.5 million . The decrease is primarily attributable to one-time charges related to the accounting treatment of a specific contract with significant differing site conditions as well as the timing and mix of projects. - Operating loss was
$11.3 million , as compared to an operating loss of$0.6 million . The decrease is primarily attributable to one-time charges related to the accounting treatment of a specific contract with significant differing site conditions as well as the timing and mix of projects. - EBITDA was
$(4.0) million , representing a (6.7)% EBITDA margin, as compared to$7.8 million EBITDA and an 8.7% EBITDA margin in the prior year period.
- Contract revenues were
$84.2 million , an increase of approximately 16.3%, as compared to$72.4 million . The increase is attributable to a larger volume of work being executed in theDallas market. - Operating income was
$6.0 million , as compared to operating income of$3.8 million . - EBITDA was
$7.2 million , representing an 8.5% EBITDA margin, as compared to$5.0 million EBITDA and a 6.9% EBITDA margin in the prior year period.
Segment Results for Full Year 2016 Compared to Full Year 2015
- Contract revenues were
$284.6 million , a decrease of 18.0%, as compared to$347.1 million . The decrease is primarily attributable to the retrenchment ofTampa operations and to one-time charges related to the accounting treatment of a specific contract with significant differing site conditions. - Operating loss was
$12.4 million , as compared to an operating loss of$14.2 million . The loss is primarily attributable to the retrenchment ofTampa operations and to one-time charges related to the accounting treatment of a specific contract with significant differing site conditions. - EBITDA was
$15.9 million , representing a 5.6% EBITDA margin, as compared to$11.1 million EBITDA and a 3.2% EBITDA margin in the prior year period.
- Contract revenues were
$293.6 million , an increase of 145.9%, as compared to$119.4 million . The increase is attributable to having TAS concrete operations for a full year as well as a larger volume of work being executed, primarily in theDallas market. - Operating income was
$16.5 million , as compared to operating income of$6.2 million . - EBITDA was
$22.4 million , representing a 7.6% EBITDA margin, as compared to$9.5 million EBITDA and an 8.0% EBITDA margin in the prior year period.
Backlog
Backlog of work under contract as of December 31, 2016 was a record-high of
“During the fourth quarter, we bid on approximately $837 million and were successful on approximately $190 million,” said Chris DeAlmeida, Orion Group Holding’s Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. “This resulted in a 1.3 times book-to-bill ratio for the quarter and a win rate of 22.7%. In the HCMC segment, we bid on approximately $495 million during the fourth quarter 2016 and were successful on $139 million, which translated into a 2.3 times book-to-bill ratio and a win rate of 28.1% for the quarter. The CCC segment also had healthy bid levels for the quarter, bidding on approximately $342 million in work while being awarded approximately $51 million. This yielded a 0.61 times book-to-bill ratio and a win rate of 14.9% for the quarter.”
Outlook
Mr. Stauffer stated, “As we look at 2017, we remain optimistic about the opportunities across both our segments and we are poised to take advantage of overall economic improvements and potential increases in infrastructure spending. The HCMC segment is making strides in the right direction and we continue to track federal, state and local government funding initiatives, as well as private sector expansion plans throughout our operating areas. With respect to our CCC operations, we look forward to extending our momentum in the
“We begin 2017 with a solid backlog, exciting opportunities for new business avenues and continued strong demand for our services across both business segments”, said Mr. DeAlmeida. “In total, we have approximately $782 million worth of bids outstanding, including approximately $78 million on which we are apparent low bidder, or have been awarded subsequent to the end of the fourth quarter, of which, approximately $10 million pertains to the HCMC segment and approximately $68 million is in the CCC segment. However, recently in our HCMC segment our customers have been experiencing delays in permitting by the
“As we look at full year 2017, we believe we will generate a significant improvement in EBITDA relative to 2016 driven by sustained bid opportunities, record-high backlog and a return to growth from our
About
Source: Orion Marine Group